OFFICIAL SPONSORS
Sports Trainer |
Email: cardiotrek@gmail.com Hours: Tues-Thurs 10-5:30, Sat-Sun 10-3:30 |
|
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Bicycle licenses in Toronto? Don't make me laugh
CANADA - In the current mayoral campaign the issue of whether Toronto should force cyclists to get licenses to ride their bicycles has come up in the local media. This isn't the first time the city has thought about licensing cyclists. They failed in their attempt last time and they will certainly fail again.
According to the city’s website there are three reasons why licensing would NEVER work:
#1. How do you license children?
#2. How do make sure the database is complete and accurate when bicycles are privately bought and sold on a constant basis?
#3. Licensing cyclists won't change their behaviour.
I have some more reasons the city hasn't thought of:
#4. What about tourists who like cycling downtown or on Centre Island? Bike rental places would be put out of business.
#5. Cyclists will NEVER agree to pay $200 for a cycling license.
There's approx. a million people in Toronto who own bicycles... at $200 each this is nothing more than a $200 million tax grab. Taxing cyclists is also completely unenforcable. The police don't even stop cyclists to see if they have a light or a rear reflector so they're certainly not going to worry if cyclists have a license.
What the city wants to do is create a "Department of Cycling". Cyclists would have to take a road test every 2 years. Bike shops, associations and bicycle mechanics would have be registered and pay fees to help pay for the system.
Cyclists would pay $200 every 2 years to have a license.
Businesses and associations would pay $500 every year to be registered.
The city would hire a team of people to administer the database and use some of the funding to help make future bike lanes.
Children under the age of 16 would be exempt from licensing.
Bike shops, associations, schools, after-school programs and summer camps would be asked to teach bike safety.
However this will do nothing to change the behaviour of cyclists. Licensing doesn't change the behaviour of motorists, so why would it change cyclists? Asking cyclists to pay $200 every 2 years is really just a PUNISHMNENT for being a cyclist and has nothing to do with road safety and everything to do with motorists-who-despise-cyclists and are jealous of the fact we cyclists don't have to pay anything.
His proposal also includes enforcing stiffer fines and penalties on reckless cyclists, introducing a points system and the ability to suspend licenses. A special police unit would be created just for catching cyclists.
This plan is being promoted by Robert Kirsic (who works for the Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council in Toronto), who admits he prefers to drive a car, and apparently has it stuck in his head that police need to have a crackdown on cyclists and turn Toronto into a police state with respect to cyclists.
(Side Note: So why can't they create a special police unit just for catching people who smoke within 9 meters of public entrances? Oh wait, its because its a waste of time enforcing every little law.)
Robert Kirsic is apparently an idiot. He hasn't clued in that if other cities haven't been able to enforce bicycle licenses, then its obviously not going to work in Toronto where one out every five people owns a bicycle... in a city of 5 to 6 million. Bicycle licensing is a joke. It would be a waste of time and resources and will do NOTHING to create a safer environment. Its nothing more than a $200 million tax grab.
Want to make the roads safer? Start by adding bicycle lanes to all major roads. Educate drivers about the fact cyclists are here to stay and they have an equal right to use the road. (We've been here longer than drivers technically if you compare the years at which bicycles and cars were invented.)
And while you're at it pass a law requiring drivers to leave a 5' space between the car and curb at all times. Quite a few accidents happen when drivers box in cyclists by driving too close to the curb sometimes on purpose (some drivers are just dangerous pricks).
According to the city’s website there are three reasons why licensing would NEVER work:
#1. How do you license children?
#2. How do make sure the database is complete and accurate when bicycles are privately bought and sold on a constant basis?
#3. Licensing cyclists won't change their behaviour.
I have some more reasons the city hasn't thought of:
#4. What about tourists who like cycling downtown or on Centre Island? Bike rental places would be put out of business.
#5. Cyclists will NEVER agree to pay $200 for a cycling license.
There's approx. a million people in Toronto who own bicycles... at $200 each this is nothing more than a $200 million tax grab. Taxing cyclists is also completely unenforcable. The police don't even stop cyclists to see if they have a light or a rear reflector so they're certainly not going to worry if cyclists have a license.
What the city wants to do is create a "Department of Cycling". Cyclists would have to take a road test every 2 years. Bike shops, associations and bicycle mechanics would have be registered and pay fees to help pay for the system.
Cyclists would pay $200 every 2 years to have a license.
Businesses and associations would pay $500 every year to be registered.
The city would hire a team of people to administer the database and use some of the funding to help make future bike lanes.
Children under the age of 16 would be exempt from licensing.
Bike shops, associations, schools, after-school programs and summer camps would be asked to teach bike safety.
However this will do nothing to change the behaviour of cyclists. Licensing doesn't change the behaviour of motorists, so why would it change cyclists? Asking cyclists to pay $200 every 2 years is really just a PUNISHMNENT for being a cyclist and has nothing to do with road safety and everything to do with motorists-who-despise-cyclists and are jealous of the fact we cyclists don't have to pay anything.
His proposal also includes enforcing stiffer fines and penalties on reckless cyclists, introducing a points system and the ability to suspend licenses. A special police unit would be created just for catching cyclists.
This plan is being promoted by Robert Kirsic (who works for the Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council in Toronto), who admits he prefers to drive a car, and apparently has it stuck in his head that police need to have a crackdown on cyclists and turn Toronto into a police state with respect to cyclists.
(Side Note: So why can't they create a special police unit just for catching people who smoke within 9 meters of public entrances? Oh wait, its because its a waste of time enforcing every little law.)
Robert Kirsic is apparently an idiot. He hasn't clued in that if other cities haven't been able to enforce bicycle licenses, then its obviously not going to work in Toronto where one out every five people owns a bicycle... in a city of 5 to 6 million. Bicycle licensing is a joke. It would be a waste of time and resources and will do NOTHING to create a safer environment. Its nothing more than a $200 million tax grab.
Want to make the roads safer? Start by adding bicycle lanes to all major roads. Educate drivers about the fact cyclists are here to stay and they have an equal right to use the road. (We've been here longer than drivers technically if you compare the years at which bicycles and cars were invented.)
And while you're at it pass a law requiring drivers to leave a 5' space between the car and curb at all times. Quite a few accidents happen when drivers box in cyclists by driving too close to the curb sometimes on purpose (some drivers are just dangerous pricks).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
NOTE
Spam comments will not be approved. If you want to advertise your product or service (or want to sponsor this blog) please send an email.
Popular Posts
-
Need some extra carrying capacity on your bicycle? Maybe enough to take a whole extra person with you? Basically what happened was I was...
-
Bottom Bracket - The assembly between the pedals that allows the Crankset to rotate. Bottom Bracket Shell - Part of the bicycle frame that c...
-
Bike shops are ALWAYS looking to hire more bicycle mechanics, especially in the Spring. The problem however is the Old Catch 22... they on...
-
BRAKE LEVER TERMINOLOGY Adjusting Barrel - A hollow screw used to change the length of the brake inner wire. Barrel Locknut - A nut that hol...
-
By Smokey Dymny from the Quadra Bike School Too many beginners jump on a bike without knowing exactly how to set it up for comfort. The w...
-
The suspension in the front forks of a bike takes a lot of stress. All the weight of the rider and all the bumps and bounces of the terrai...
-
Since bicycles have been around since the 19th century there are many different thread standards that have been used. Standards also vary fr...
-
Ignore the photo on the right... its not really a cycling shirt. ;) What I want to pass on this time is clothing. Specifically cycling shi...
-
Bicycle chains turn black over time as the chain lube collects dirt and grit while riding or locked up outside. This is unfortunate and affe...
-
Is it a bicycle? Or is it a baby stroller? Or is it an expensive death trap for your toddler? The Dutch sure do love their bicycles, so its ...
About the Author
Charles Moffat is equal parts bicycle mechanic, cyclist, painter, sculptor, fantasy writer, poet, website designer and pun maker. For more details see charlesmoffat.com.
CONTACT INFO
Email
JOB POSTINGS
Do you own a bike shop and are looking to hire a bicycle mechanic in North America? Just email me with the job posting details and I will post it for you. (Also, please let me know when the job has been filled so I can update the posting.)
SELL YOUR OLD BIKE
If your bicycle is basically junk and you don't know what to do with it then SELL IT TO ME. I will use it for parts. I will give you a fair price ($20 to $30) for your old clunker just so I can rip it apart for parts.
If you need repairs check out my Bicycle Mechanic Services in Banbury-Don Mills.
No comments:
Post a Comment